Cigar Review: Sindicato Maduro

Sindicato MaduroVitola: Magnum
Size: 6″ x60 ring gauge
Price ~$14.00 MSRP
Obtained From Sindicato Cigars as a review sample

Background

Since this is my first post of the new year, I want to wish everyone a happy new year!  The cigar I’m going to be looking at today is the latest from the Sindicato Cigar company simply called the Maduro.  Which pretty much tells you what it is.  This is a follow up to their natural cigar from earlier last year.  You can check out my review on that one here.  The Maduro is comprised of Nicaraguan fillers from Esteli and Jalapa, a double binder fom Esteli and a San Andres Morron wrapper that was grown by the Turrent family in Mexico.  The cigar comes packed in boxes of 16 and ranges in price from $11.50-$14.  All 4 sizes; 6″x54 toro, 7″x52 Churchill, 5″x54 robusto, and the subject of this review 6″x60 magnum, are all box pressed.  It is billed as a three-quarter strength cigar as well.  This was the third one of this blend I tried.

Prelight

The band on this cigar is very similar to the natural but is easily distinguishable from it because of the use of silver instead of gold.  On the back of the band it clearly states the size name, size and has a barcode which makes it very easy to know what you’re smoking and to ring up on a POS system.  The wrapper on the cigar was a nice even dark chocolate brown with lots of tooth and a good amount of oils.  The box press on it wasn’t super sharp but was very well done, sort of like what you see on a Padron Anniversario.  When I gave it a squeeze there was a slight amount of give with no soft spots.  When I put my nose to the wrapper I could detect the light aroma of leather with barnyard coming from the closed foot.  When I clipped it and took a cold draw on it I could taste a slight amount of cinnamon with a good draw.

Flavor

The cigar took a little bit of work to get lit with my single flame Allume, which I don’t remember having to do with the other ones.  I have noticed that this sometimes happens with a closed footed cigar.  When I did get it lit I could taste chocolate and red pepper, with a slight burning on the retrohale.  After a few puffs I started to taste some leather and cream as well.  The cigar was firmly in the medium range as it started off.  As I moved into the send third the flavors changed slightly to coffee, leather, hints of chocolate and cream with a fairly sweet finish.  The flavor didn’t really change as I moved into the final third of the cigar.  The spice did start to come back during this third but it never really moved out of the medium strength range.

Construction

The draw was great throughout the cigar.  The burn was quite a bit uneven and the touch-ups with my lighter didn’t seem to help.

Value

I’d have a difficult time paying $14 for this cigar as I’d be able to pick up a 1964 Anniversario Maduro for that price and it is a much more complex and interesting cigar.

Conclusions

By the end of the cigar I was a little bored with it since it didn’t seem to hold my interest.  It could have been just the day or because the cigar is a 60 ring gauge.  I can’t remember the size of the other ones I smoked (yeah I didn’t see the labeling until this cigar) but if I remember correctly they were more flavorful and more enjoyable.  However the price point puts it at a place where I would probably not purchase it.  I know they are a fairly small company but that price point puts them firmly in competition with some established companies and makes standing out important.  So all that to say I can’t not recommend it or can’t exactly recommend it.  As always if this sounds interesting to you give it a try and see how your experience compares to mine, but I’d recommend one of the smaller ring gauge ones.

By-The-Numbers

Prelight: 2/2
Construction: 1.5/2
Flavor: 3.5/5
Value: .5/1
Total: 7.5/10

Keith Hollar

Keith has been a cigar enthusiast since 2003 and it's rumored that he remembers details about every single cigar he's ever smoked. He wrote for Tiki Bar Online for four years before co-founding Leaf Enthusiast. Twitter: @Keith1911

You may also like...

17 Responses

  1. Miguel Rocha says:

    Happy New Year to you too! Looking forward to this year’s reviews and although you can’t recommend this cigar 100% I am still interested in the brands offerings. Thanks for the review!

  2. Mark VanSledright says:

    Happy New Year. I have heard some good things about this cigar, but I concur, I would rather smoke a Padron for a few dollars less and know for certain I won’t be “bored”.

  3. Texican says:

    Sounds interesting enough, but that price doesn’t.

  4. czerbe says:

    As you know that is way to high of a price range for me to buy a cigar that doesn’t WOW me! Now that I think of it I don’t remember a Closed Foot Cigar that has ever been really really good! I love the look but thats all pre lite. Great review Sorry it was a bummer.

  5. BlackBetsy1919 says:

    First review by Mr. Hollar I have read. Like the insight. Thanks!

  6. dale427 says:

    Ooooo… I see more expensive cigar reviews this year!

  7. Christopher Brose says:

    Haven’t had the opportunity to smoke any Sindicato as of yet. I do not see me spending that kind of money on newer cigars either.

  8. Tim says:

    That’s kinda steep for Sindicato especially for our NY taxes so it would be even more. I’ve had their Hex line and it was ok. I’d rather spend it on a #9 or T52. Thanks for the review Keith look forward to more.

  9. fatkid says:

    this is the issue with boutiques to me. pricing on them is so high, why would i pay that to try a new brand that has a comparable price tag to a quality cigar that i know that i would like.

  10. bob langmaid says:

    Yeah this looked good to me, but with a review like that I would probably pass on this one, or maybe get a single to give it a try. Review made a good point, if you’re selling a cigar for this price, it should stand out and be phenomenal IMO.

  11. Craig says:

    Review sounded like the cigar was decent but not for the price point. Maybe if it was a $5-$7 cigar it would be worth it. Oh well, they can’t all be winners. Happy New Years to you as well.

  12. Jeff Cierniak says:

    Gonna have to agree with others on the price point. It’s very rare that I spend that much on a cigar, and when I do it better be memorable.

  13. Lloyd L. says:

    When you mentioned the value of this cigar, I’m with you – better to go with a proven premium at that price.

  14. wm2slc says:

    I had wanted to try this.. not so much now.. thanks for the heads up!

  15. atllogix says:

    6 x 60 is too big and definitely shouldn’t be used as a clear reference point of a blend. Try out another vitola before writing it off completely.

  16. Peter Brown says:

    Overall it’s a nice smoke. The construction stayed solid, the burn was good and the smoke production was decent.
    http://lacasadelhabano-brussels.be

  1. February 27, 2015

    […] Leaf, I’m sure), along with a Mexican Maduro wrapper (all CF Maduros use Mexican leaf). Keith reviewed this same blend, although in a 60 ring gauge vitola, as his first review of 2015; he didn’t care […]